Monday, February 26, 2024
HomeLatest NewsTrump could order SEAL Team 6 to kill rivals and avoid prosecution...

Trump could order SEAL Team 6 to kill rivals and avoid prosecution if not impeached, lawyer says

Since the former president is the first to be charged with a crime for his activities while in office, federal courts have not yet made a precise ruling on whether or not he can be charged.

Washington, DC If Donald Trump had not been impeached and then found guilty in a Senate trial, his attorney told a federal appeals court on Tuesday that he would still not be prosecuted for any of the crimes he committed as president, including ordering the military to kill political rivals, selling military secrets to foreign adversaries, or offering pardons to criminals.

During arguments on Trump’s immunity from prosecution before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Florence Pan told Trump’s attorney John Sauer, “You’re saying a president could sell pardons, could sell military secrets, could order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival.”

Sauer warned the three-judge panel that if a president was found guilty of ordering the assassination of an opponent, they would be promptly impeached. However, he contended thatThe Supreme Court has ruled that the courts can never review an official act of a president unless there is an impeachment.

Before the criminal prosecution, he would have to be and would be swiftly impeached and found guilty, according to Sauer. “Under our Constitution, there would have to be a political process.”

“The official acts are immune if there is never an impeachment and no conviction. Sauder later said, “Period.

Attending the hearing, Trump argues that since his acts occurred within his presidency, he is not subject to criminal charges of plotting to influence the 2020 race. On the same charges that he instigated the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, he was impeached in the House of Representatives and found not guilty in the Senate.

Assistant Special Counsel James Pearce, a prosecutor, expressed worry for the future of the nation if presidents could assassinate opponents or sell national

A touchdown by Edwards gives Michigan the lead in the championship game.
On January 8, 2024, Donovan Edwards, a running back for Michigan, celebrates with head coach Jim Harbaugh following his touchdown in the first half of the National Championship NCAA college football playoff game against Washington in Houston. On January 8, 2024, Donovan Edwards, a running back for Michigan, celebrates with head coach Jim Harbaugh following his touchdown in the first half of the National Championship NCAA college football playoff game against Washington in Houston. He completed a 71-yard drive with a tackle-breaking 12-yard score to give the Wolverines a 27-13 lead and some breathing room. Michigan led until the middle of the fourth quarter.

Trump’s attorney claims that prosecuting him could unlock “Pandora’s box.”

The judges considering the case seemed concerned about the requirement that the Senate convict and the House impeach a president before any criminal charges can be brought. The court stated that Congress can choose not to impeach a president for a variety of reasons.

“Not every individual must undergo that procedure,” stated Judge Michelle Childs.

“It seems like a lot of things might not go through that process because it’s a fairly laborious process,” Pan remarked.

However, Sauer claimed that the impeachment procedure is what prevents presidents from having their policy choices questioned by prosecutors and political competitors. He maintained that the case against Trump ought to be dropped.

Sauer said, alluding to President Joe Biden, “the current incumbent of the presidency is prosecuting his No. 1 political opponent and his greatest electoral threat.”

Without this shield, according to Sauer, Barack Obama might have faced legal action for approving drone attacks that resulted in civilian casualties, and George W. Bush might have faced charges for disseminating misleading information to support the invasion of Iraq.

“Permitting the prosecution of a president for his official actions would unleash a Pandora’s box that this country might never be able to close,” stated Sauer.

Differentiating between private and public actions

Judge Childs pointed out that former President Richard Nixon may have faced criminal charges but was pardoned instead being impeached.

However, Sauder contended that, similar to Bill Clinton’s accusations of private rather than public malfeasance, Nixon’s purported misconduct included private behaviour rather than official acts.

Judge Karen Henderson questioned the prosecution on how the justices could craft a ruling without giving way to charges against presidents in the future.

Pearce contended that the fact that Trump is the first former president to be charged with a crime serves as evidence that prosecutors, grand juries, and trial juries already prohibit unjustified prosecutions.

According to Pearce, investigators looking into the Iran-Contra crisis believed that Ronald Reagan should face legal action, but they were unable to gather sufficient proof to bring a case.

Pearce refuted Nixon’s accusations of private conduct, claiming that Nixon was suspected of using the CIA to obstruct an FBI investigation. Pearce maintained that there would be no accountability if presidents were exempt from criminal prosecution.

Pearce stated, “I want to push back on this idea of floodgates.”

Calling the session “a very good day,” Trump


This was not the first time that Trump made the decision to appear in court after leaving the president. Additionally, he has appeared on multiple occasions for his civil fraud trial in New York, where state Attorney General Letitia James is suing him and his company for hundreds of millions of dollars. In that instance, the closing arguments are set for this Thursday.

According to Trump, the appeals hearing went smoothly. He maintained that he did nothing wrong and that presidents should be exempt from prosecution.

Following the hearing, Trump told reporters at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Washington, D.C., “We think we had a very good day today.” “I did nothing, and a president is required to have immunity.”

What accusations does Trump want to be exempt from?


In response to four federal charges—three for conspiracy and one for obstruction—Trump has entered a not guilty plea. The charges stem from his attempts to invalidate the official election results and his false accusations of electoral fraud.

On January 6, 2021, the prosecution claims that the schemes culminated in the attack on the Capitol. Over 140 police officers were hurt in the violence, which also led lawmakers and then-Vice President Mike Pence to evacuate and momentarily stopped Congress from certifying Biden’s victory.

Tanya Chutkan, the U.S. District Judge, denied Trump’s motion to dismiss the case. “Defendant’s four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens,” Chutkan stated in her verdict on Dec. 1.

Trump said that he was acting “unquestionably” in the course of his official duties in reacting to possible electoral theft. He challenged her ruling.

Who is in charge of the case hearing?

A panel of three judges heard the case. George H.W. Bush appointed Henderson. Biden appointed both Childs and Pan.

The losing party may challenge the decision to the entire D.C. Circuit, which consists of the 11 present judges, regardless of the panel’s decision.

The losing party may request that the case be heard by the Supreme Court based on the whole appeals court’s decision.

What justifies Trump’s claim?


Trump’s attorneys contended that the government’s founders and the Constitution both believed that the president should be immune from criminal prosecution in order to shield the position from political rivals.

In his petition, Sauer stated that “no prosecutor, judge, or jury may sit in judgement over the President’s official acts.” Citing an early Supreme Court ruling, he remarked, “A President’s official acts ‘can never be examinable by the courts.”

Sauer also mentioned a more recent ruling from the Supreme Court, Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982). Presidents are completely shielded from civil litigation for actions taken while in office, the court decided on a 5-4 vote.

Sauer said that the President is guaranteed immunity because to his “unique position within the constitutional scheme.”

Sauer contended that Trump could not be convicted for the same acts again because the Senate cleared him of all charges during an impeachment trial in which he was accused of evoking the Capitol uprising. Despite the fact that a two-thirds majority was needed for conviction, the Senate voted 57–43 to find Trump guilty.

“Furthermore menacing and crippling to the Presidency than the threat of civil liability is the likelihood of mushrooming politically motivated prosecutions and future cycles of recrimination,” Sauer said.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments